Grzegorz Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Pierwszym z wariantów, jest „klasyk” PTS-M … Cdn... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted December 25, 2007 Author Share Posted December 25, 2007 Mały dodatek.. z MTH made in DDR... ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted March 4, 2008 Author Share Posted March 4, 2008 Cdn... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted April 12, 2008 Author Share Posted April 12, 2008 Cdn... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliopillet Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 Dear friends: I am using an Internet translator so if something is bad writing, Excuse me. I have checked the profile of the PTS - M as the cross section and a photo of your Walkaround using the measurements limited to scale 1/35 and they do not square me. Is it possible that the cross section that you use belongs to a previous model? Of the PTS or of the PTS 2? I wait for your opinion or that of anyone that could extract of doubts. Thank you. This is the profile in cross section, in red. This is the profile in a side view of your Walaround, in blue. There are the two profiles, in a 1/35 scale of the lenght and width dimension, I supossed that width is to the top of cabin. Let's forget the light distortion of the bow and of the stern for the perspective to the being a photo taken from the center. It remains clear that, at least for me, it is a question of two different vehicles. Especially if we contemplate the photo 4f3f45529232b6e1 of the rear cabin and the photo 8c19415f17ce62a7 of the bow of your Walkaround, it appreciates that the angle of the rear part of the cabin and the angle of the bow, are different in the two. Some idea? Thank you again.[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted January 6, 2009 Author Share Posted January 6, 2009 It don't suggest drawing. It execute him for this showing structure of vehicle only. It is not executed in suitable proportion and scale Nie sugeruj się rysunkiem. Wykonano go tylko dla pokazania budowy tego pojazdu.Nie jest wykonany we właściwej proporcji i skali. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliopillet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Hi, Friends; Here again, this time with plan of the PTS-M. work in progress yet. Julio Pillet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted January 19, 2009 Author Share Posted January 19, 2009 What prepare you graphic program in? Prepare you in Autocad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliopillet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 No. I used Corel Draw X3. I m' very silly for AutoCad. Julio Pillet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juliopillet Posted January 21, 2009 Share Posted January 21, 2009 Hi, Again; This is the plan of the PTS-M at it's state today. I few detaill was to be add in a proper day. Julio Pillet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Posted January 21, 2009 Author Share Posted January 21, 2009 Observe it genuine amenity effects of your work. To prawdziwa przyjemność oglądać efekty twojej pracy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.